In the name of God
The Source of our Existence



The Truth Shall


Welcome to my site


I have proved Holy Torah, Holy Bible, and Holy Quran CANNOT be word of God.

To present my evidence I have proved that   Moses Story is a self-evidenced Fiction and a Hoax   and it CANNOT be word of God.

To extend the proof that Holy Books CANNOT be word God, I refer to Darwin Theory of Evolution. Any reasonable person would acknowledge that Darwin Theory of Evolution of species is a sound scientific theory that without any exception has been accepted by all credible scientists. Darwin's Theory of Evolution clearly nullifies the validity of Adam and Eve story of creation which is the foundation of all three Abrahamic faiths.

Also, the Big Bang theory is accepted by all credible scientists. This finding proves the falsehood of Genesis Story of Creation.

All these various evidences prove that Holy Torah, Holy Bible, and Holy Quran CANNOT be word of God. And all these three scriptures were produced by wisdom of ancient Man in a childish form of fairytales. This is an insult to human's intelligence to believe that all Knowledgeable God has deceived us and has sent us those false stories in those faulty scriptures.

Christians tell us that Jesus was a Jew and while he was living on this earth he was preaching the Holy Torah to his followers. So, Jesus who was preaching the faulty scripture with false stories COULD NOT be all knowledgeable God!

Christians believe that around 2000 years ago some wicked people captured ALMIGHTY God and nailed him to cross until he died. I guess there is no limit to human's Gullibility!

In many verses, Quran confidently boasts its unique and unparalleled status that it is infallible, and it is flawless, and it is the masterpiece of literature. Here I am presenting   A list of over 100 flaws in verses of Quran.   Quran is a primitive book and it cannot be word of God. And if we really believe in All-Knowledgeable God, then we should object such literary disgrace book to be considered as word of God.

Moslems, Christians, Jews, and Hindus throughout their histories have killed their infidels. I wonder are we intelligent enough to reject this Savage Barbarity? Our perception of God needs to get beyond these primitive religions.

Based on the teachings from the Holy Books at present time the Israelites are committing atrocities and murders in Palestine, the Serbs Committed Genocide in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Saudi Arabia, Isis and many other Moslem fanatics are mercilessly murdering their fellow Moslems throughout the Middle East and Africa, Moslem terrorists are murdering innocent civilians all over the world. I wonder can any Civilized human being accept these primitive Books as Holy?

Isn't it odd after acquiring so much in-depth knowledge still we are engaging in so many barbarities!? But why?
Our odd and savage behaviors defy and undermine the essence of our long earned genetic intelligence. Here I am forced to question the validity of   "the truth shall set you free"! Because, the truth has many layers! We might be very satisfied at one layer, but the deeper layer might upset our accepted understanding. Our peculiar behavior reveals other elements within the reality of our existence. We might know the facts, but our beliefs, our biases, our preferences, and so on, they do overshadow our established facts! And this strange phenomenon points to a source who feeds and controls the reality of our individual lives! We might think that everything is randomly manifests itself based on chaotic and random motions, and this view might seem to be in harmony with our scientific theories at a certain layer, but there might be a deeper layer that could control the events based on some other principles. For example the brutal pains and sufferings that life experiences at the level of human consciousness they look ugly and nasty, and that is a major deficiency against the existence of Almighty Creator, but the same brutal pains and sufferings at a deeper level they might present beauty, serenity, vitally necessary, and superbly prudent. When I was twelve years old I broke my left arm, it was excruciating painful. Under such severe pain at first impression one might question why a broken arm should hurt so badly? Then we find out that severe pain is our body defense mechanism, and that pain is a loud warning for us to take care of our broken arm, otherwise we may lose our life because of the broken arm. Only then, we may realize the wisdom and the necessity of that severe pain for our broken arm. Pain, Hardship, and Struggle play a major role improving our fighting skills, as a result advancing survival of our spices.

We should never be hasty in our conclusions, our past history has shown us that sometimes because of some hasty and faulty conclusions we committed serious crimes; destruction of library in Alexandria was one example of such a case. And certainly we cannot be indecisive in accepting a better revealing argument. Here, we are facing with dichotomy of two valid but contradicting thoughts. But, let me assure you that these two contradicting thoughts is not unique just to this case, our personal desires, our individual preferences, our philosophy, our science are filled with this kind of conflicting dichotomy of choices. For example science is struggling to decide whether Time, flow of Time, Free Will, and Consciousness are real or they are illusions of our mind. Rigors scientific studies of these puzzling subjects has not yet settled these issues to anybody's satisfaction. It seems it is by design that we are distend to wrestle with these confusing and contradictory thoughts and bouncing between them throughout our lives. Through these mind challenging struggles the truth gradually and gracefully reveals itself in a refined and timely manner.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Consciousness


Consciousness is an elusive phenomenon. There are much debates and discussions about the nature of our Consciousness. In a nutshell our Consciousness is our awareness about our existence and about our activities. Our awareness presumably emerges from the activities of the components of our brain. But, our glorious science yet to be able to recognize the existence of this emerging awareness! Science has interjected that our Consciousness might be an illusion. Perhaps science is right, the examined activities of our brain do not produce our Consciousness. Maybe the source of our Consciousness has not been identified correctly. I think I have found the Source, and here I am going to prove its existence, and its activities. I will show after all God is not just a silent by stander, God is the Active Conductor of the events of this Universe in extremely minute details.

In order to establish validity of a claim we need to move the argument from the realm of the philosophical discussions into the domain of testable scientific analysis. On PBS brain series program with Dr. David Eagleman, he talked about "Iowa Gambling Task experiment". By this experiment and other experiments scientists have proved when the activities of our sub-conscious mind are realized by our Conscious mind, those information are already old news. This means there is a time delay between the comprehension within our sub-conscious mind and the comprehension in our Conscious mind. This discovery is very important, but I do think that "Iowa Gambling Task experiment" reveals something much more fundamental, it reveals the Source of our awareness. Let us review this experiment more closely, then I will explain my reason for the ramifications of this revealing discovery.

Iowa Gambling Task experiment

Task structure
Participants are presented with 4 virtual decks of cards on a computer screen. They are told that each time they choose a card they will win some game money. Every so often, however, choosing a card causes them to lose some money. The goal of the game is to win as much money as possible. The decks differ from each other in the number of trials over which the losses are distributed. Thus, some decks are "bad decks", and other decks are "good decks", because some will lead to losses over the long run, and others will lead to gains.

Common finding
Most healthy participants sample cards from each deck, and after about 40 or 50 selections are fairly good at sticking to the good decks. Concurrent measurement of galvanic skin response shows that healthy participants show a "stress" reaction to hovering over the bad decks after only 10 trials, long before conscious sensation that the decks are bad.

The Brain with David Eagleman on PBS | How Do I Decide?

The winning incentive in "Iowa Gambling Task experiment" is an abstract incentive. As far as we know only human conscious mind has the capability to comprehend the meaning of an abstract incentive, no other living creatures is capable comprehending of such abstract incentive. And now we have discovered that our sub-conscious mind possesses the intelligence to recognize such abstract incentive much faster than our Conscious mind. This is a shocking discovery, how is this possible? The result of this experiment suggests that this is our sub-conscious mind which evaluates the winning deck of cards and feeds its finding into our Conscious mind. I made this conclusion based on the following reasons, this would be highly unlikely and very unrealistic to think that our sub-conscious mind figures out the winning deck of cards, and it does not use this valuable information for the task on hand, and instead it waits for our Conscious mind to figure out the winning deck of cards on its own slower processes. Here we are talking of the system of our body as an enterprise, who is putting its best effort trying to win a competition. There is no reason for our sub-conscious mind not to broadcast its sharp finding to benefit the enterprise of our system.

It would have been interesting if the Gambling Task was stopped after the 20th selection. Then regarding to the knowledge of the winning deck we needed to examine the state of our sub-conscious mind and the state of our Conscious mind after 24 hours.

We have known that our Conscious mind has the best thinking power, and it is supreme. And our sub-conscious mind barely possesses such thinking capability. In "Iowa Gambling Task experiment" we have discovered by some unknown means the states of these capabilities has been reversed. Now the question arises how did our sub-conscious mind acquire this capability that it became far superior than our Conscious mind? This is possible only if our sub-conscious mind was assisted by another Intelligent Agent in this process. And perhaps this is the generosity of this Intelligent Agent who is constantly feeding our sub-conscious and our Conscious mind by very measured circumstances.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

"Iowa Gambling Task experiment" is not the only experiment that shows us scientifically the active influence of this Intelligent Agent in processes of this world. I found two other very common phenomena which prove similar conclusions. They are "Paradox of the reflected images from mirrors" and "Formation of Multiple Symmetries in Snowflake's Designs".

Paradox of the reflected images from mirrors

First let us examine "Paradox of the reflected images from mirrors". We all have seen the reflection of images from the surfaces of calm water, or from a window, or from a mirror. The reflected images from these smooth and flat surfaces are flipped images of the incoming images that are hitting these surfaces. The optic law of reflection states that "the incident ray, the reflected ray, and the normal to the surface of the mirror all lie in the same plane. Furthermore, the angle of reflection is equal to the angle of incidence". (This optic law was quoted from Wikipedia.) This optic law is correct for each and every one of the photons in the incoming and the reflected images. The consistency of these reflections causes the reflected image to look exactly like the flipped image of the incoming image.

Quantum Electrodynamic theory (QED) tries to answer the mechanics of the mirror reflection at the atomic level. When a single photon hits to the surface of a mirror or to the surface of calm water QED theory says it most likely the photon gets absorbed by an electron, and this energized electron moves to a shell of higher energy, and when this energized electron emits a photon, it moves back to its equilibrium shell. In fact the emitted photon is not the same photon that hit the surface of the mirror. The process of the electron emitting a photon is covered by the uncertainty rule. QED gives a statistical model for this emission. In this statistical model no specific direction is identified, but it defines the statistical pattern which the new photon gets emitted in many possible directions. In this process the time of emission is also governed by a statistical model. The emission of photon by an electron with these statistical models has been verified in laboratory numerous times, and this is a fact in QED theory.

As you see in this explanation for the mechanic of the reflection, since the directions of the reflected photons are based on statistical model they hardly could comply with the optic law of reflection. As a result the reflected image could hardly resemble the flipped image of the incoming image. In fact in this QED's explanation the reflected photons are dispersed in random directions that they could hardly produce any recognizable image in any direction.

In order to reconcile QED's statistical reflection model with the optic law of reflection, QED has devised "all path argument". I detected a major flaw within "all path argument", and I posted my argument in the following physics forum: https://www.physicsforums.com/

I was very respectful in all my exchanges with the members who responded to my post. The members of the forum failed to defend QED's "all path argument", and instead they began to realize the validity of my argument. At this point all of a sudden I was banned from the forum! There was no call for such rash action. And for sure that was not the way that science solves puzzles! The forum could have ignored my post. Surely I could not demand a respond for my post. I think they were too embarrassed to admit the existence of such an obvious flaw within our beloved QED theory. QED theory is the foundation of all our amazing new electronic technologies.

You can view "all paths argument" by Prof. Richard Feynman in his lecture (# 2 of 4) at Auckland University in New Zealand. (This argument is at about 28:00 minutes of the video in lecture #2.) Prof. Richard Feynman lecture (# 2 of 4) at Auckland University.

Let me explain the flaw of QED's "all path argument". QED's "all path argument" conveniently chooses the reflection direction that it is provided by the optic law of reflection, and then it claims that the summation of the amplitude vectors for this selected path is maximum, and then QED concludes, that is how a photon finds its direction naturally by examining all paths and chooses the path that the summation of its amplitude vectors is maximum. To expose the flaw within "all path argument", I suggest that we move the photo-multiplier few inches from its current position, and then redo the all path summation of the amplitude vectors for this new location. According to "all path argument" the summation of the amplitude vectors for this new location is still maximum, and according to QED this photo-multiplier at this new location should also receive the reflected photon! But since the photo-multiplier at this new location does not comply with the optic law of reflection, then it will not receive the reflected photon, and QED's "all path argument" has produced a wrong result. In fact if we add few more photo-multipliers in the vicinity of the first photo-multiplier, according to QED's "all paths argument" the summation of the amplitude vectors for each one of these photo-multipliers are also maximum, and each of these photo-multipliers should also receive that single photon, which we do know that is a wrong conclusion. So, QED's "all path argument" is just a phony and bogus argument.

As you see regarding to the reflected image from a mirror QED theory has been totally baffled and it cannot figure out how the emission of a photon from the surface of a mirror or water, is directed in a specific direction that they are in compliance with the optic law of reflection. In mirror reflection how does the emitting electron know that it belongs to a smooth surface of a mirror and it should NOT emit its photon in the direction that is defined by the statistical model, and instead it should emit its photon in the direction that complies with the optic law of reflection? I do NOT think that the emitting electron possesses the cognition to recognize the differences between these two situations. In fact the optic law of mirror reflection that forces the emitting electron to emit its photon in a specific direction, that violates or eliminates the uncertainty rule.

For sure the reflected images from mirror requires the influence of an Intelligent Agent who produces this deliberate result. Without the influence of this Intelligent Agent the reflected image from a mirror would have been a mixed up lights in all directions and without any observable image. As you see the mirror reflection phenomenon which looks so simple and presumably un-important, and if it did not exist probably it would have not made any difference in the processes of nature, except that it would have hindered the growth and the development of our intelligence a great deal. The effect of the reflected images in development of our intelligence has been immense and maybe it has been essential. Similar to our Consciousness the reflected images that manifest their existence in conflict with the detailed scientific findings, they both point to the existence of an Intelligent Agent in these phenomena. It seems that these rich stimulating phenomena have been intelligently and intentionally designed to nurture the development of our inquisitive minds.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

The existence of Multiple Symmetries in Snowflakes' Designs

This is the third phenomenon which I found out that it requires the influence of an Intelligent Agent for its manifestation.

I got the following passage on snowflake's formation from Wikipedia. "The exact details of the sticking mechanism remain controversial. Possibilities include mechanical interlocking, sintering, electrostatic attraction as well as the existence of a "sticky" liquid-like layer on the crystal surface. The individual ice crystals often have hexagonal symmetry." "Most snowflakes are not completely symmetric." "Empirical studies suggest less than 0.1% of snowflakes exhibit the ideal six-fold symmetric shape." "The most common snow particles are visibly irregular, although near-perfect snowflakes may be more common in pictures because they are more visually appealing." "A non-aggregated snowflake often exhibits six-fold radial symmetry. The initial symmetry can occur because the crystalline structure of ice is six-fold. The six "arms" of the snowflake, or dendrites, then grow independently, and each side of each arm grows independently." "Since the micro-environment (and its changes) are very nearly identical around the snowflake, each arm can grow in nearly the same way."

Snowflakes formation is a case of a well-known phenomenon that science has failed to come up with a plausible answer to explain it, and instead it has resorted to few phony and incoherent arguments to FIT the KNOWN fact! Science has attributed snowflakes' artistic symmetries to the structure of water molecules. To prove the falsehood this argument, let us briefly examine the ramification of this argument. According to this explanation the structure of the water molecules causes the frozen water molecules to form a hexagon shape foundation (diamond dust). And they claim when the new water molecules get attached to this hexagon shape foundation, they get attached to its six corners, as a result the snowflakes develop six symmetrical arms, which they grow fairly in similar shape, because the micro-atmospheric environment is very similar for all these six growing arms while they are forming.

There are many flaws in this explanation, and each one of these flaws is sufficient to discredit this explanation to its core, and I will try to explore few.

The snowflakes' shapes are NOT the MAGNIFICATION of the hexagon shape that water molecules bonding produces at their foundation! This is so absurd to claim the structure of a molecule to influence the shape of the structures at the visible level. The microscopic hexagon shape at the foundation is too tiny that they could influence the shape at the macroscopic level.

To show you the validity of these statements, first I look at that hexagon shape at the foundation of a snowflake when one billion water molecules are attached to each of its arms. Then, let us look at a tiny piece of snow at the center of any snowflake, this observable tiny speck of snow, which it does not show any symmetry, within it contains many billion times of that "six billion molecules hexagon shape structure", and all those "six billion molecules hexagon shape structures" are buried within this tiny speck of snow at the center of the snowflake, without showing any trace of any hexagon shape symmetries whatsoever! As you see science has offered us a bogus argument, that it does not make any sense!

Let us focus on a small section of a snowflake's arm, let's assume the thickness of this arm is around .5 mm, and this section of arm is around 1 mm wide, and only 2 mm in length. In this little candy bar shape of the snowflake's arm there are more than 10 to the power 17 (10^17) water molecules. These water molecules have been attached to each other in various directions that they are measurable in all three axes. Just in this little candy bar shape of the snowflake's arm there might be billions and billions of hexagon shapes water molecules structures (diamond dust). As you see the hexagon shapes bonding at the foundation has not affected the shape of this candy bar shape at all. The hexagon shape of water molecules bonding at atomic level is too insignificant that they could influence the developing shape of the snowflake at our visible level.

Claiming that the hexagon shape of water molecules bonding at the snowflake's foundation is the cause of various symmetries in the snowflakes' designs, is similar that we claim that the structure of the paint molecules produced Mona Lisa! I doubt it that anybody would even consider such possibility.

Science has failed to come up with any plausible argument for the multiple symmetrical designs of the snowflakes, so it has resorted to the bogus argument that the structure of the water molecules must have had something to do with it! Since in the development of the snowflakes the "randomness" is name of the game, and water molecules are too small to influence the shape of the developing snowflake, then the emergence of any SYMMETRICAL pattern should be totally an unexpected outcome!

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Let us still explore snowflakes' symmetrical designs from another angel. Let us safely assume there are 10,000 different shapes of snowflakes' arms. Since a non-aggregate snowflake exhibits six arms, and each arm is developing independently, then for the snowflakes' shape we could end up with the possibility of 10,000 to the power six snowflake shapes (10,000^6), or 10 to the power of 24 (10^24) shapes. This is one snowflake in every 10^24 snowflakes would have the ideal six-fold symmetrical shape. But rough empirical counting indicates that one in every 1000 snowflakes has the ideal six-fold symmetrical shape, then there has to be a force that it is influencing the development of the snowflake's shapes, favoring the development of the ideal six-fold symmetrical shapes. This increases the probability of forming the ideal six-fold from one in every 10^24, to one in every 1000; this increases the possibility of forming the ideal six-fold shape by a factor of 10^21. And this is a huge dominating factor that we cannot ignore it! The evidence of the existence of this force who is favoring the development of the ideal six-fold snowflakes is overwhelmingly clear.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Let us still examine snowflakes' symmetrical designs from another perspective. Time lapse development of the snowflakes shows some part of snowflakes develop first and the rest of the snowflake develops gradually later, and somehow the rest of the snowflake mysteriously continue to follow the pattern of the grown arm! We expect that micro-atmospheric condition should be changing in the interval. Then absolutely there is no justification that a developing arm to follow the design of any other arm in its development. Actually the numerous possibilities in the designs should make any similarity of the arms a very rare occasion, and certainly not the norm!

In the development of the identical twins babies, their identical genes causes their identical shapes, but in snowflake developments there is no gene to force the developing arm to acquire the same shape. This strange phenomenon forces us to recognize the existence a force in the fabric of the nature, who deliberately and intelligently, introduces multiple symmetries in various parts of each snowflake structure.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

The thickness of the snowflake structures shows that vapor water molecules get bonded to the snowflakes' core structure in all three directions of x, y and z axes. Snowflakes' thickness is the result of many trillions of water molecules piled up on top of each other. The Snowflakes thickness is fairly uniform, and this produces two fairly flat surfaces. Since vaper water molecules are present everywhere, and they do get attached to snowflakes' structures in all three directions of x, y, and z, then there is no reason that two surfaces of the snowflakes to remain flat. And this is another indication of the influence of the Intelligent Agent at work in this process.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Let us analyze the development of a snowflake from another angel. Time lapse photography of snowflake shows different stages of a snowflake development. Let us focus on one of the developing arm which already has grown half way. Let us vision four little imaginary rings on this newly developing arm, and name them a, b, c, and d in a row, and let each of these rings to be one half of one millimeter apart from their adjacent ring. We know these four rings are flattened in the middle; at 90 degree and 270 degree. Let us name the left edge of these rings by a1, b1, c1, and d1. And their right edges by a3, b3, c3, and d3. And name their mid points (at 90 degree and 270 degree) by a2, b2, c2, d2 and a4, b4, c4, d4 respectively.

As the snowflakes swinging and falling down toward the earth each second the condition of the micro-environment might be changing. Because our marked points on the arm are very close together then the changes in atmosphere are affecting our marked points more or less the same way. At this situation the shape of water molecules have no impact on the shape of the developing arm; water molecules attach themselves to the growing arm without any preference, for the water molecules the bonding at a1, b1, c1, d1 are very similar to each other, and bonding at a2, b2, c2, d2 are very similar too, and so on and so forth. Of course because of the difference of the shape of the ring at point a1 and point a2 the rate of water molecule bonding at these points might be slightly different from each other, but the condition at points a1, b1, c1, d1 which all are located at the left edge of the arm are virtually the same, and they are very close together. It makes no sense that the rate of growth at point a1 be twice, or three times, or ten times of the rate of growth at point b1, or point c1, or point d1, or vice versa. But still one might argue that being one half of one millimeter apart in their positions does affect the bonding of new water molecules at those points. To flatly reject this picky criticism, I would say if being one half of one millimeter apart in the position on the arm can affect that much change in the rate of the bonding of water molecules, then for sure I expect to see far more drastic differences in the rates of growth of the similar points on the other arms of the snowflakes which are much further apart! As the empirical count shows 0.01% of snowflakes all six arms grow more or less in similar pattern! As I argued before the production of these ideal six-fold symmetric shapes with this abundance goes far beyond of the probability of random growth. These arms grow as if they are carrying the same gene, but another snowflake which is developing nearby in the same micro-atmospheric condition its arms are developing in a very different pattern, as if it is carrying a totally different gene! As far as our science is concerned absolutely there is no mechanism to coordinate or to harmonize the growth of these arms in the developing snowflake. The possibility that each arm can grow in various different shapes, but actually they do not, this process defies the scientific idea of the statistical randomness to its core.

Water molecules which come to contact with these surfaces they get attached to the developing snowflakes' structure. Maybe the micro-environment conditions at a1, a2, a3, and a4 differ from each other, because they are located at different sides of the arm, but I do not see any major factor that could influence the water molecules to favor any of these spots consistently for the duration of their development, since the snowflake is falling and the direction of its arms are constantly changing. This strange behavior defies the randomness nature of this process.

All

Scientifically most snowflakes do not have a perfect symmetry, but as far as our artistic point of view is concern their symmetrical shapes are pleasing to our eyes, an object of beauty with tremendous appeals. Their symmetries have been a source of enormous inspiration in our art and in our taste of design. Confidently I can claim their symmetrical beauties have been nurturing our intelligence and they have been contributing to our inspirational intellects. So, their beauty should not be considered just a random act of nature, it is much more than that, it is a channel guiding us and educating us to the existence of the Active Agent deep within the fabric of the nature who consciously, deliberately, and intentionally is empowering the growth of our intelligence with such clarity and awareness!

Even though the ancient man from very early stages of his intelligence was inspired to recognize the existence of this mysterious force who was influencing his environment and his life, but our advanced scientific discoveries were needed to confirm the validity of those early confusing assessments! And for us science has been and it is our best arbitrator.

This conclusion also confirms the existence of panpsychicism and synchronicity phenomena that some psychologists and philosophers have discovered them through their rational thoughts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfevXVQSaNU&index=16&list=PL-yth3DXLxrQl4BSptPEOhj-ejg4sV0CR

With unimaginable successes that our science has produced our amazing technologies it is hard to stand up and challenge our science for being faulty and wrong. I hope that you focus on the essence of my arguments and judge them rationally without being intimidated. I am sure with further investigations we can prove the existence of this Active Conductor in many other phenomena all around us, we only need to have keen observations in order to recognize them. And of course, we need to understand the corresponding scientific methodologies in order to be able to detect the possible influence of the Active Conductor in those processes.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

God
The Active Conductor


I think full glories of God are beyond human's imaginations. Each of us based on our individual capabilities can only grasp a very limited vision of God's glories. These individual visions of God have been tailor-made for each individual's capacities and experiences. Based on this understanding, I believe in the existence of God who is running our lives in minute details all the time.

In the past in some articles I assumed that God was the creator of this Universe, and he was a separate entity from this Universe. This is the view of Monotheism. I reached to that conclusion because no changes could be allowed within the glory of God. This made sense to me at that time. Then, I realized there was a problem with that view. If our Universe is outside the domain of God, then the existence of this Universe imposes a limitation to the domain of God, and this is unacceptable. Domain of God should encompass everything, and that includes our Universe. This is the view of Panentheism. But, still the contradiction of "the change within the domain of God" persists. To solve this problem we need to examine passage of Time for the events of this universe. For us passage of time is real and it is relativistic, our life has been entangled with the element of time, so passage of time and the changes that it produces is the main experiences of our life, but for God Time is a constant, and it does not change, God sees this Universe as a four-dimension block, past, present, and future exist simultaneously. And since for God all events are known then quantum uncertainty rule does not exist. And this conclusion is quite in harmony with our other findings.

Let me explore this view for the events of our life, and see how our common belief in God jives with this idea. The believers commonly believe that God hears and answers our prayers all the time. This common belief reveals an important insight to our perception of God. Let us explore a scenario. In near future we will send human astronauts to Mars and to the other planets in our solar system. Assume when the astronauts are exploring the surface of Mars one of their computer malfunctions and put their lives at risk. They immediately report the problem to earth and ask for help. At the same time they pray to God for help.

We commonly believe that God is with us all the time, then God knows of this incident right away, but how he answers our pray, this is not our focus at this point, but we will get that answer as a natural outcome for this analysis. It depends to the positions of Earth and Mars, it takes the signal from Mars to reach to Earth between 3 to 22 minutes. So, the mission control on earth will receive the information between 3 to 22 minutes in the future, but God who is present at the mission control already knows about the future signals in advance. So, as a believer we have to conclude, at least in this scenario, God knows the future before we do.

This scenario also reveals another fact, that God gets all the information instantly, and the distance in space is not a barrier for God. So, a supernova which exploded seven billion years ago, and we will receive that signal let's say ten years from now, but God already knows of that information at present time. This scenario reveals for God the past information and the future information is present simultaneously at present time. For God the presence of the simultaneous information at all time means that God has instant knowledge of every photon at all time. Then, this Universe becomes a four dimensional block of events that it is present to God simultaneously without any change for the passage of time. In this four dimensional block Universe all events are strictly under certainty rule, and all the quantum probabilistic events which are puzzling our grasp of the underneath mechanics of the events vanishes altogether! Since this vision of universe at domain of God is a fixed structure and it does not evolve at all, then we can consider this universe as part of God, or a project of God that exists within his domain. But, for us and all material things in this four dimensional block universe we do experience the passage of time and the limitation of the uncertainty rule.

So, in this picture that every event is already established with absolute certainty, our Free Will for our physical body is absolutely out of question. In order that our Free Will to have any validity at all, we need to associate an individual soul which it is not energy based, and somehow it is connected to our physical body, but it cannot influence the conducts of our physical body. Our soul responds spiritually to the experiences of our physical body, and our Free Will boils down to the nature of these spiritual reflections. This is like we are watching a movie which we cannot control or influence anything, we only can form some thoughts and emotions about the content of the movie, and that is all. In processes of our life maybe our soul is learning something.

I hope you could tolerate the shortcoming of my writing.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The material of this site may be reproduced in any medium, without applying for permission. (Provided they are unedited, and retain the original author/ copyright information.)

Moses Story is just a self-evidenced Fiction and a Hoax

God and Reason

A list of 100 flaws in Quran

Bahaullah's Claims

Christianity in Crisis

Adam and Eve Story of Paradise

Ancient Jewish Communities

Jesus Life and His Beliefs

Jesus Message and Jesus Miracles

Jesus and Judas Plan

Jesus Resurrection

Jesus Movement after Jesus Crucifixion

Apostle Paul and Brotherhood Communities

Destruction of the Jewish Temple and Start of Christianity

Paul's Vision on the Road to Damascus

Flaw in QED "all path argument"

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


The following links are some discussions that I had in few forums.

Religious Education / Abrahamic Religions / God and Reason

Lisa Shea Forum / Religious Research / Why do I believe in God?

Gods, Heroes, and Myth Forum / Other Mythologies / Faulty Religious Myths can not take us far

http://www.religiousforums.com/search/11487398/?page=2

Religious Education / Abrahamic Religions / Jesus Body

Religious Education / Abrahamic Religions / How far is Heaven?

Religious Education / Abrahamic Religions / Does Jesus have any limitation?

Cygnus' Study "Evolution/Creation" Evolution is part of the Creation

Backpage.com Forums / Religion & Philosophy / Civility


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Persian Translation

E-mail:

Unes Gollestani

Unes